The Hamilton
Citations
- 207 U.S. 398
- 28 S. Ct. 133
- 52 L. Ed. 264
- 1907 U.S. LEXIS 1234
Syllabus
<p>Until Congress acts on the subject^ a State may legislate in regard to the duties and liabilities of its citizens and corporations while on the high seas and not within the territory of any other sovereign.</p> <p>Where a fund is being distributed in a proceeding to limit the liability of the owners of a vessel, all claims to which the admiralty does not deny existence must be recognized, whether admiralty liens or not.</p> <p>The statute of Delaware giving damages for death caused by tort is a valid exercise of. the legislative power of the State, and extends to the case of a citizen of that State wrongfully killed while on the high seas in a vessel belonging to a Delaware corporation by the negligence of another vessel also belonging to a Delaware corporation. A .claim against the owner of one of the vessels in fault can be enforced in a proceeding in admiralty brought by such owner to limit its liability.</p> <p>When both vessels in collision are in fault the representatives of a seaman on one of the vessels, killed without contributory negligence on his part, may, in- a proceeding-to limit -liability, where an action is given by the state statute against the owner of the other vessel, recover full damages, and are not- limited to damages recoverable under the maritime law against the seaman’s own vessel for death or injury caused by negligence of the master thereof or his fellow servants thereon. ' Neither the seaman’s contract with the owners of the vessel he is on; nor the negligence of his own vessel, -nor any provision of the Harter Act affects the claim* against the other vessel.</p>
Judges: Holmes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
185 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court· 1932-02-23· cited 1,799×
- Southern Pacific Company v. JensenSupreme Court· 1916-02-28· cited 1,199×
- Moragne v. States Marine Lines, Inc.Supreme Court· 1970-06-15· cited 1,104×
- Romero v. International Terminal Operating Co.Supreme Court· 1959-04-06· cited 1,043×
- Pope & Talbot, Inc. v. HawnSupreme Court· 1953-12-07· cited 1,000×
- Gillespie v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court· 1964-12-07· cited 896×
- The Minnesota Rate CasesSupreme Court· 1913-06-09· cited 719×
- Kossick v. United Fruit Co.Supreme Court· 1961-05-29· cited 611×
- Wilburn Boat Co. v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceSupreme Court· 1955-04-11· cited 605×
- Truax v. CorriganSupreme Court· 1921-12-19· cited 592×
- Yamaha Motor Corp., USA v. CalhounSupreme Court· 1996-01-09· cited 570×
- Offshore Logistics, Inc. v. TallentireSupreme Court· 1986-06-23· cited 525×
- Garrett v. Moore-McCormack Co.Supreme Court· 1942-12-14· cited 515×
- Mobil Oil Corp. v. HigginbothamSupreme Court· 1978-10-02· cited 509×
- Garrett v. Moore-Mccormack Co., Inc.Supreme Court· 1943-04-05· cited 499×
- Rodrigue v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court· 1969-06-09· cited 492×
- Kernan v. American Dredging Co.Supreme Court· 1958-02-03· cited 440×
- Steele v. Bulova Watch Co.Supreme Court· 1952-12-22· cited 370×
- Just v. ChambersSupreme Court· 1941-03-31· cited 319×
- Red Cross Line v. Atlantic Fruit Co.Supreme Court· 1924-02-18· cited 289×
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- The OsceolaSupreme Court· 1903-03-02· cited 885×
- SHERLOCK v. Alling, AdmInistratorSupreme Court· 1876-11-18· cited 306×
- The BelgenlandSupreme Court· 1885-04-13· cited 240×
- Slater v. Mexican National RailroadSupreme Court· 1904-04-11· cited 239×
- Manchester v. MassachusettsSupreme Court· 1891-03-23· cited 170×
- The ChattahoocheeSupreme Court· 1899-04-03· cited 156×
- Homer Ramsdell Transportation Co. v. La Compagnie Générale TransatlantiqueSupreme Court· 1901-05-27· cited 116×
- The Albert DumoisSupreme Court· 1900-04-09· cited 107×
- Wilson v. McNameeSupreme Court· 1881-01-10· cited 65×
- Erie Railroad v. Erie & Western Transportation Co.Supreme Court· 1907-01-14· cited 53×
- Andrews v. WallSupreme Court· 1845-02-24· cited 30×
- The HamiltonSecond Circuit· 1906-06-22· cited 17×
Other cases named The Hamilton
3 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.