The Iroquois
Citations
- 194 U.S. 240
- 24 S. Ct. 640
- 48 L. Ed. 955
- 1904 U.S. LEXIS 850
Syllabus
<p>While a master is not bound in every instance where a seaman is seriously injured to disregard every other consideration,, and put into the nearest port where medical assistance can be obtained, his duty to do so is manifest, if the accident happens within a reasonable distance of such a port.</p> <p>The duty of the master in each case depends upon its own circumstances, and although the case may not be free from doubt this court will apply its general rule both in equity and admiralty cases, not to reverse the concurring decisions of two subordinate courts upon questions of fact unless there be a clear preponderance of evidence against' their conclusion.'</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that reasonable care depends on, inter alia, “the proximity of an intermediate port”
- explaining that reasonable care depends on, inter alia, “the proximity of an intermediate port”
- where seaman injured in service of ship, master had duty to put in to port in order to provide adequate treatment
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brown
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
107 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court· 1932-02-23· cited 1,799×
- Vaughan v. AtkinsonSupreme Court· 1962-06-25· cited 753×
- Kossick v. United Fruit Co.Supreme Court· 1961-05-29· cited 611×
- Panama Railroad v. JohnsonSupreme Court· 1924-04-07· cited 561×
- Cortes v. Baltimore Insular Line, Inc.Supreme Court· 1932-12-12· cited 433×
- O'Donnell v. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co.Supreme Court· 1943-02-01· cited 257×
- The Arizona v. AnelichSupreme Court· 1936-04-27· cited 203×
- De Zon v. American President Lines, Ltd.Supreme Court· 1943-05-03· cited 154×
- The GermanicSupreme Court· 1905-02-20· cited 109×
- Thomas D. Joyce v. Atlantic Richfield Company, a Pennsylvania CorporationTenth Circuit· 1981-07-01· cited 81×
- Harry J. Holmes v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., Inc.Fifth Circuit· 1982-08-09· cited 72×
- Patricia Franza v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd.Eleventh Circuit· 2014-11-10· cited 70×
- Fitzgerald v. A. L. Burbank & Co.Second Circuit· 1971-11-12· cited 66×
- Hume v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.Second Circuit· 1941-06-23· cited 63×
- Francis A. Deisler v. McCormack Aggregates, Co. Dredge \Sandy Hook\, Her Boilers, Engines, Tackle, Appurtenances, Etc.Third Circuit· 1995-05-03· cited 56×
- Central Gulf Steamship Corporation v. Basilio SambulaFifth Circuit· 1968-12-30· cited 39×
- Medina v. EricksonNinth Circuit· 1955-10-19· cited 39×
- Vitco v. JoncichS.D. California· 1955-04-29· cited 38×
- Muise v. AbbottFirst Circuit· 1947-04-09· cited 36×
- Cricket S. S. Co. v. ParrySecond Circuit· 1920-01-14· cited 36×
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- The OsceolaSupreme Court· 1903-03-02· cited 885×
- Harden v. GordonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine· 1823-10-15· cited 176×
- Smith v. BurnettSupreme Court· 1899-03-13· cited 113×
- Towson v. MooreSupreme Court· 1899-02-20· cited 62×
- Brown v. OvertonD. Massachusetts· 1859-03-15· cited 16×
- The \Richmond.\Supreme Court· 1880-12-13· cited 6×
Other cases named The Iroquois
3 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.