Skip to main content
· 5/12/2010

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Bleecker

Citations

  • 994 A.2d 928
  • 414 Md. 147
  • 2010 Md. LEXIS 188

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding aggravating factor (d) is implicated as a result of numerous violations of the Rules
  • concluding a Rule 8.4(d) violation where attorney failed to promptly notify client and advise her to seek advice of independent counsel regarding a malpractice action, which “seriously impair[ed] public confidence in the entire profession”
  • finding a violation of Rule 8.4(c) where an attorney failed to disclose that the court dismissed client’s case with prejudice
  • listing “prior disciplinary offenses[]” and “substantial experience in the practice of law[,]” among other factors, as aggravating factors in attorney discipline cases
  • the violation of multiple disciplinary rules implicated aggravating factor (d)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Battaglia

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.