Attorney Grievance Commission v. Fezell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that letters from Bar Counsel constitute lawful demands for information pursuant to MLRPC 8.1(b)
• letters from Bar Counsel qualify as lawful demands for purposes of rule 8.1(b)
• letters from Bar Counsel qualify as lawful demands for purposes of rule 8.1(b)
• attorney who violated MLRPC 1.3, 8.1(a), 8.4(a) and (d

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).