Attorney Grievance Commission v. Barton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the attorney violated Rule 5.3(a), (b), and (c) by failing to supervise a non- lawyer who met with clients, quoted fees, provided legal advice, and held himself out as an attorney
• holding that the attorney violated Rule 19-301.4 when she failed to adequately communicate with her clients and did \not keep her clients informed regarding the status of their case or respond to their attempts to communicate with her\
• finding that knowingly permitting a non-attorney to handle client intake and provide legal advice constituted assisting in the unauthorized practice of law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).