Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Spaulding

Citations

  • 991 S.W.2d 651
  • 1999 WL 236400

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • even if there is a reasonable certainty that testimony was false, “the materiality of the testimony is not so certain”
  • “[Rule 60(b)(6)] is a catch-all provision that encompasses those grounds, which would justify relief pursuant to [the] writ of coram nobis, that are not otherwise set forth in the rule.”
  • “CR 60.02(f) is a catch-all provision that encompasses those grounds, which would justify relief pursuant to writ of coram nobis, that are not otherwise set forth in the rule.”
  • “CR 60.02(f) is a catch-all provision that encompasses those grounds, which -5- would justify relief pursuant to writ of coram nobis, that are not otherwise set forth in the rule.”
  • due process violation for unknowing use

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Johnstone, Lambert, Cooper, Graves, Wintersheimer, Stumbo, Stephens

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.