Jones & Guerrero Co., Inc. v. Sealift Pacific, a Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court had jurisdiction over the motion to set aside because the motion was properly brought under a ground that had no time limit
• District Court of Guam had jurisdiction under F.R.C.P. 60(b) to set aside a previous order dismissing the action
• rule allows correction of clerical mistakes not made by clerk
• Civil Rule 60(a) used to correct a blanket 3 order dismissing twenty-two diversity cases, where the court 4 intended to remand one of those cases — the only one not 5 originally filed in federal court — to territorial court
• Civil Rule 60(a) used to correct a blanket 3 order dismissing twenty-two diversity cases, where the court 4 intended to remand one of those cases — the only one not 5 originally filed in federal court — to territorial court
• involving an order setting aside a previous order of dismissal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).