Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Seventh Circuit· 4/30/2024

Asli Baz v. Anthony Patterson

Citations

  • 100 F.4th 854

Oral argument

Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that stipulations between the parties should not be allowed “to bind third parties or to dictate the district court’s factual determinations”
  • recognizing that stipulations between the parties should not be allowed “to bind third parties or to dictate the district court’s factual determinations”
  • recognizing that stipulations between the parties should not be allowed “to bind third parties or to dictate the district court’s factual determinations”
  • confirming that “parental intent alone” does not “dictate a child’s habitual residence.”
  • rejecting—based on Monasky’s directive—proposed categorical rule that a state court’s habitual residence determination conclusively established habitual residence in Hague Convention proceedings
  • petitioner was exercising custody rights where the evidence showed she “actively sought to maintain regular contact” with the child

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Asli Baz v. Anthony Patterson

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.