Seventh Circuit· 11/16/2012
Iain Walker v. Norene Walker
Citations
- 701 F.3d 1110
- 89 Fed. R. Serv. 1272
- 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 23505
- 2012 WL 5668330
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “any sort of regular contact” with the child qualifies as “exercising ... custody rights” under the Convention
- stating that a wrongful removal did not occur when parents agreed to travel to the United States
- stating that a court has discretion to order the return of the child “even if it finds that the parent opposing the petition has established that one of the [affirmative defenses] applies”
- noting father’s letter requesting specific visitation times “can hardly be characterized as indifferent to custody issues”
- noting that the “actually exercising” standard is a “liberal” one
- not‐ ing that “any sort of regular contact” with the child qualifies as “exercising … custody rights” under the Convention
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bauer, Posner, Wood
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Derek Redmond v. Mary RedmondSeventh Circuit· 2013-07-25· cited 71×
- Darin v. Olivero-HuffmanFirst Circuit· 2014-03-19· cited 46×
- Pedro Flores Rodriguez v. Yolanda Salgado Yanez, eFifth Circuit· 2016-03-28· cited 30×
- Tann v. BennettSecond Circuit· 2015-12-03· cited 28×
- Raul Salazar-Garcia v. Emely Galvan-PineloSeventh Circuit· 2015-12-22· cited 27×
- Julio Ortiz v. Zulima MartinezSeventh Circuit· 2015-06-15· cited 26×
- Jose Candido Diaz Palencia v. Marilis Yaneth Velasquez PerezEleventh Circuit· 2019-04-30· cited 16×
- Guerrero v. OliverosN.D. Illinois· 2015-08-11· cited 12×
- Martinez v. CahueSeventh Circuit· 2016-06-24· cited 11×
- Asli Baz v. Anthony PattersonSeventh Circuit· 2024-04-30· cited 11×
- In re Marriage of MilneAppellate Court of Illinois· 2018-10-19· cited 6×
- Kerry Jones v. Cassandra FairfieldNinth Circuit· 2021-09-15· cited 6×
- Sabogal v. VelardeD. Maryland· 2015-05-20· cited 6×
- Cunningham v. CunninghamM.D. Florida· 2017-02-17· cited 6×
- Garcia v. PineloN.D. Illinois· 2015-08-16· cited 3×
- Cascio v. PaceN.D. Illinois· 2014-01-16· cited 3×
- Garcia v. TineloN.D. Illinois· 2015-08-28· cited 2×
- Londono v. GonzalezD. Massachusetts· 2013-11-18· cited 2×
- Selo v. SeloE.D. Michigan· 2013-03-08· cited 1×
- Jaded Martinez v. Peter CahueSeventh Circuit· 2016-06-24
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Emanuel Friedrich v. Jeana Michele Friedrich, David Harper and Shirley HarperSixth Circuit· 1996-03-13· cited 354×
- In Re: The Application Of, Arnon Mozes v. Michal MozesNinth Circuit· 2001-01-09· cited 276×
- Jeremiah W. Holder v. Carla R. Holder, Jeremiah W. Holder v. Carla R. HolderNinth Circuit· 2002-09-06· cited 244×
- Zurich American Insurance Company v. Watts IndustriesSeventh Circuit· 2005-08-02· cited 170×
- Tsai-Yi Yang v. Fu-Chiang TsuiThird Circuit· 2005-08-03· cited 166×
- Henry G. Baxter v. Jody Amanda BaxterThird Circuit· 2005-09-15· cited 130×
- Milla Karkkainen v. Vladimir Ivanovich Kovalchuk Julie L. D'ItrIThird Circuit· 2006-04-24· cited 103×
- Robert Hechter Silverman v. Julie Hechter SilvermanEighth Circuit· 2003-08-05· cited 98×
- Evelyn Larbie v. Derek LarbieFifth Circuit· 2012-07-31· cited 75×
- Antonia P. Koch v. Dane J. KochSeventh Circuit· 2006-06-13· cited 69×
- Asuncion Mota v. Rivera CastilloSecond Circuit· 2012-08-15· cited 69×
- Norinder v. FuentesSeventh Circuit· 2011-09-06· cited 48×
- Ulrich G. Bader v. Sonja KramerFourth Circuit· 2007-04-18· cited 47×
- Navani v. ShahaniTenth Circuit· 2007-07-30· cited 37×
- Habrzyk v. HabrzykN.D. Illinois· 2011-01-07· cited 7×
- In Re PolsonS.D. Illinois· 2008-09-11· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.