ARVEST BANK v. Byrd

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning that defendants’ act of transferring real property “fifteen days before” its general contractor stopped working for nonpayment supported a finding of fraud
• suggesting that transfer of real estate “for no consideration although, less than one and one-half years later, the real estate had a stated value of $472,000” was fraudulent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).