Skip to main content
· 11/14/1989

Interroyal Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Ralph H. Sponseller, and Superior Roll-Forming Company, Inc., an Ohio Corporation

Citations

  • 889 F.2d 108
  • 15 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 985
  • 12 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1892
  • 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 17024
  • 1989 WL 135790

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the plaintiff did not establish a causal connection also because “the record provides no details as to . . . when [the complaints] were made”
  • noting that, even at summary judgment, the Court is not “obligated to wade through and search the entire record for some specific facts that might support the nonmoving party’s claim”
  • reversing trial court decision that denied plaintiff’s motion to amend complaint
  • “[T]he designated portions of the record must be presented with enough specificity that the district court can readily identify the facts upon which the nonmoving party relies[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jones, Norris, Woods

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.