Arrington v. Colortyme, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that Rule 12(b)(1) allows a defendant to move to dismiss a complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, which may be challenged based on lack of standing of the plaintiff
• explaining we must draw in the plaintiff’s favor all reasonable inferences supported by well-pleaded facts
• “Absent standing, and by extension, subject-matter jurisdiction, the court does not possess the power to decide the case, and any disposition it renders is a nullity.”
• “In a facial attack, the defendant contests the sufficiency of the well-pleaded allegations insofar as they provide a basis for the court’s exercise of subject-matter jurisdiction; as under Rule 12(b)(6

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).