Third Circuit· 8/22/2007
Marten v. Godwin
Citations
- 499 F.3d 290
- 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 19921
- 2007 WL 2377807
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that court lacked special jurisdiction over the University of Kansas based on its expulsion of a Pennsylvania resident from its internet-based education program, allegedly in retaliation for plaintiff’s exercise of his freedom of expression under the First Amendment
- explaining that where “a plaintiff fails to show that the defendant ‘“manifest{[ed] behavior intentionally targeted at and focused on” the forum [state],’ the plaintiff fails to establish jurisdiction under the effects test’’
- stating that “nothing in the record indicates that defendants made defamatory statements or sent defamatory material to anyone in” the forum state and that “where defendants aimed their defamatory statements is jurisdictionally significant”
- applying the Calder effects test to evaluate personal jurisdiction in a case involving a retaliation claim
- noting that a plaintiff must also present facts establishing that the defendant aimed its Plaintiff argues that QVC had outlet retail stores in New Jersey until recently and ran tours which made stops in the state last summer. (PI.’s Reply Br. 7.
- explaining that “the state of a plaintiff’s residence does not on its own create jurisdiction over nonresident defendants. Jurisdiction is proper when the state of a plaintiff’s residence is the focus of the activities of the defendant out of which the suit arises.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sloviter, Chagares, Greenberg
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
88 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Dudnikov v. Chalk & Vermilion Fine Arts, Inc.Tenth Circuit· 2008-01-28· cited 651×
- Tamburo v. DworkinSeventh Circuit· 2010-04-08· cited 510×
- Doe v. Luzerne CountyThird Circuit· 2011-10-12· cited 215×
- Pichler v. UNITEThird Circuit· 2008-09-09· cited 196×
- Abdouch v. LopezNebraska Supreme Court· 2013-04-19· cited 118×
- Display Works, LLC v. BartleyD. New Jersey· 2016-04-25· cited 102×
- In Re Chocolate Confectionary Antitrust LitigationM.D. Pennsylvania· 2009-03-04· cited 90×
- Kehm Oil Co. v. Texaco, Inc.Third Circuit· 2008-07-31· cited 71×
- ARLANDSON v. Hartz Mountain Corp.D. New Jersey· 2011-05-26· cited 67×
- JS Ex Rel. Snyder v. Blue Mountain School Dist.Third Circuit· 2011-06-13· cited 61×
- MaxLite, Inc. v. ATG Electronics, Inc.D. New Jersey· 2016-06-24· cited 44×
- Kenneth Hasson v. Fullstory IncThird Circuit· 2024-09-05· cited 37×
- Lutz v. Rakuten, Inc.E.D. Pennsylvania· 2019-04-22· cited 35×
- Christie v. National Institute for Newman StudiesD. New Jersey· 2017-06-28· cited 33×
- Torcup, Inc. v. Aztec Bolting Servs., Inc.E.D. Pennsylvania· 2019-07-09· cited 33×
- Al-Ghena International Corp. v. RadwanD. New Jersey· 2013-07-16· cited 33×
- Graphics Properties Holdings Inc. v. Asus Computer International, Inc.D. Delaware· 2013-06-28· cited 28×
- Vizant Technologies, LLC v. WhitchurchE.D. Pennsylvania· 2015-04-01· cited 27×
- Government Employees Insurance Co. v. NealeyE.D. Pennsylvania· 2017-06-13· cited 24×
- Oticon, Inc. v. Sebotek Hearing Systems, LLC.D. New Jersey· 2011-08-22· cited 24×
Cites
25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1945-12-03· cited 18,588×
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court· 1985-05-20· cited 12,253×
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court· 1980-01-21· cited 8,668×
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court· 1984-04-24· cited 6,200×
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court· 1990-06-27· cited 5,583×
- Calder v. JonesSupreme Court· 1984-03-20· cited 3,198×
- Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court· 1977-06-24· cited 2,976×
- Keeton v. Hustler Magazine, Inc.Supreme Court· 1984-03-20· cited 2,597×
- Kulko v. Superior Court of Cal., City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court· 1978-06-26· cited 1,640×
- Harold Pinker, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Roche Holdings Ltd. Harold PinkerThird Circuit· 2002-05-30· cited 1,405×
- O'CONNOR v. Sandy Lane Hotel Co., Ltd.Third Circuit· 2007-07-26· cited 825×
- Bruce Ball v. Metallurgie Hoboken-Overpelt, S.A.Second Circuit· 1990-04-27· cited 663×
- Toys \R\ Us, Inc. Geoffrey, Inc. v. Step Two, S.A. Imaginarium Net, S.LThird Circuit· 2003-01-27· cited 629×
- Imo Industries, Inc. v. Kiekert AgThird Circuit· 1998-09-03· cited 594×
- Lloyd Z. Remick, Esq. v. Angel Manfredy John Manfredy Jeffrey H. Brown, Esq. Kathleen H. Klaus, Esq. D'AnconA & PflaumThird Circuit· 2001-01-25· cited 402×
- Provident National Bank v. California Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nThird Circuit· 1987-06-04· cited 347×
- General Electric Company v. Deutz AgThird Circuit· 2001-10-31· cited 272×
- ESAB Group, Inc. v. Centricut, Inc.Fourth Circuit· 1997-10-17· cited 242×
Other cases named Marten v. Godwin
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.