ARRABALLY AND YERRABELLY
Citations
- 25 I. & N. Dec. 771
Syllabus
ARRABALLY AND YERRABELLY, 25 I&N Dec. 771 (BIA 2012) (Amended Order) ID 3748 (PDF) An alien who leaves the United States temporarily pursuant to a grant of advance parole does not thereby make a \departure . . . from the United States\ within the meaning of section 212(a)(9)(B)(i)(II) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(9)(B)(i)(II) (2006). Matter of Lemus, 24 I&N Dec. 373 (BIA 2007), clarified.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that policy set forth in DHS memoranda “is entitled to respect to the extent it has the ‘power to persuade,’ but it is not binding” (quoting Christensen v. Harris County, 529 U.S. 576, 587 (2000))
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Muhammad Rais v. Eric Holder, Jr.Sixth Circuit· 2014-09-16· cited 39×
- Kelvin Ortiz-Bouchet v. U.S. Attorney GeneralEleventh Circuit· 2013-04-23· cited 18×
- J-A-B- & I-J-V-ABoard of Immigration Appeals· 2017-07-01· cited 6×
- Sofokli Gazeli v. Jefferson B. Sessions, IIISixth Circuit· 2017-05-18· cited 5×
- OPPEDISANOBoard of Immigration Appeals· 2013-07-01· cited 3×
- S.A. v. TrumpN.D. California· 2018-12-10· cited 2×
- RUZKUBoard of Immigration Appeals· 2016-07-01· cited 1×
- ARAMBULA-BRAVOBoard of Immigration Appeals· 2021-09-23
- FURTADOBoard of Immigration Appeals· 2024-05-17
Cites
26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 20,645×
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1970-05-04· cited 7,191×
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court· 1944-12-04· cited 4,567×
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court· 1965-04-26· cited 3,144×
- Christensen v. Harris CountySupreme Court· 2000-05-01· cited 2,025×
- Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court· 2000-03-28· cited 1,963×
- National Cable & Telecommunications Assn. v. Brand X Internet ServicesSupreme Court· 2005-06-27· cited 1,506×
- Gustafson v. Alloyd Co.Supreme Court· 1995-02-28· cited 1,256×
- National Ass'n of Home Builders v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court· 2007-06-25· cited 939×
- Norwegian Nitrogen Products Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1933-02-06· cited 734×
- King v. St. Vincent's HospitalSupreme Court· 1991-12-16· cited 703×
- Dolan v. United States Postal ServiceSupreme Court· 2006-02-22· cited 655×
- Marie Therese Halim Assa'ad v. United States Attorney General, Immigration and Naturalization ServiceEleventh Circuit· 2003-06-05· cited 187×
- BRIONESBoard of Immigration Appeals· 2007-07-01· cited 95×
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1990-05-21· cited 94×
- Bankers Life and Casualty Company v. United StatesSeventh Circuit· 1998-04-17· cited 87×
- David Ibragimov v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralSecond Circuit· 2007-01-25· cited 41×
- CHERUKU v. Attorney General of USThird Circuit· 2011-09-22· cited 34×
- CASTILLO-PADILLABoard of Immigration Appeals· 2010-07-01· cited 26×
- RODARTEBoard of Immigration Appeals· 2006-07-01· cited 25×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.