Malinowski v. Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding the district court did not violate petitioner’s right to present a defense by excluding victim’s school counselor’s testimony at trial
• affirming the denial of a petition for habeas corpus because “even if the Wisconsin Court of Appeals had applied the wrong standard, the proper standard results in the same con- clusion.”
• “[E]ven if the [state court] had applied the wrong standard, the proper standard results in the same conclusion . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).