District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2/4/2005
Arnold v. State
Citations
- 892 So. 2d 1172
- 2005 WL 264107
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding circumstances sufficient for jury to find premeditation without reference to the “special” standard of review
- “[A] trial court should not grant a motion for judgment of acquittal unless the evidence adduced is such that no view that the jury may lawfully take of it favorable to the State can be sustained under the law.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Monaco
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Lynch v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1974-03-13· cited 390×
- Darling v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2002-01-03· cited 134×
- Larry v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1958-07-11· cited 89×
- Chamberlain v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2004-06-17· cited 88×
- Pearce v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2004-07-01· cited 83×
- Floyd v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2003-06-12· cited 66×
- Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1997-11-06· cited 54×
- Green v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1998-05-21· cited 40×
- Huck v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-07-16· cited 13×
- Hartman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-02-24· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.