Armstrong v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• requiring that the trial court finding be made on the record so as to facilitate appellate review of trial court’s decision
• requiring that district court finding be made on the record
• district court must weigh the probative value of the proffered evidence against its prejudicial effect
• on-the-record Petrocelli hearings “provide this court with a meaningful opportunity to review the district court’s exercise of discretion”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Tavares v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2001-09-17· cited 101×
• Wesley v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1996-04-30· cited 70×
• Rippo v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1997-10-01· cited 64×
• Qualls v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1998-09-02· cited 33×
• Knipes v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2008-10-02· cited 32×
• Chappell v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1998-12-30· cited 22×
• Walker v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2000-04-06· cited 18×
• Meek v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1996-12-20· cited 18×
• Walker v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1996-07-22· cited 13×
• Colon v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1997-04-24· cited 11×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Petrocelli v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1985-01-04· cited 199×
• United States v. Ellison M. Stockton
  Fourth Circuit· 1986-04-09· cited 124×
• United States v. Jesus Martinez
  Tenth Circuit· 1991-07-08· cited 110×
• Seim v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1979-02-07· cited 60×
• Anglian v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1986-10-06· cited 56×
• Tellis v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1968-12-31· cited 45×
• United States v. Oscar Lara and Cavern City Construction Company
  Tenth Circuit· 1992-02-13· cited 28×
• Berner v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1988-12-21· cited 22×
• Gier v. Ninth Judicial District Court
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1990-03-27· cited 19×