North v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that “an out-of-court statement may be admissible to establish the material effect that statement had on a listener – regardless of whether that statement was true or not”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• BRENDAN SIGISMONDI v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2024-01-12

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Baird
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1990-11-29· cited 92×
• Foster v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2000-09-07· cited 63×
• Armstrong v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2011-09-22· cited 32×
• Burkey v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-03-01· cited 25×
• Smith v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-05-28· cited 23×
• Marvin Cannon v. State of Florida
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2015-09-24· cited 16×
• Alfaro v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-09-25· cited 15×
• Jenkins v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-12-16· cited 12×
• Miller v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-08-01· cited 10×
• White v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-10-31· cited 7×
• Buchanan v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-08-25· cited 7×
• Glenn v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-03-10· cited 4×
• Massey v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-03-20· cited 3×