Seventh Circuit· 7/24/1998
Armstrong v. Squadrito
Citations
- 152 F.3d 564
- 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 17018
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the Eighth Amendment \applies only to a convicted prisoner rather than a pretrial detainee whose rights receive the protection of due process\
- analyzing whether jailers were delib- erately indifferent to detainee’s prolonged detention caused by clerical error
- holding 57-day detention without initial appearance violated substantive due process
- finding substantive due process violation after a delay of fifty-seven days
- finding substantive due process violation after a delay of fifty-seven days
- “[B]ecause this decision rein- states Armstrong’s federal claims, on remand the district court should en- tertain supplemental jurisdiction over Armstrong’s state law claims.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
39 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Livell Figgs v. Alex DawsonSeventh Circuit· 2016-07-25· cited 173×
- West v. TillmanEleventh Circuit· 2007-08-27· cited 135×
- Moya v. GarciaTenth Circuit· 2018-07-10· cited 77×
- Gai Levy v. Marion County SheriffSeventh Circuit· 2019-10-18· cited 64×
- Albany Bank & Trust Company, Not Individually, but Solely as Trustee Under Trust No. 11-4067 v. Exxon Mobil CorporationSeventh Circuit· 2002-11-08· cited 61×
- Jessica Jauch v. Choctaw CountyFifth Circuit· 2017-10-24· cited 48×
- A.M. Ex Rel. J.M.K. v. Luzerne County Juvenile Detention CenterThird Circuit· 2004-06-10· cited 42×
- James Courtney v. Kimberly ButlerSeventh Circuit· 2023-05-03· cited 28×
- St. Augustine School v. Jill UnderlySeventh Circuit· 2023-08-14· cited 28×
- United States v. Ted PhillipsEleventh Circuit· 2016-08-23· cited 27×
- Destiny Hoffman v. Susan KnoebelSeventh Circuit· 2018-07-03· cited 23×
- Martin v. Shawano-Gresham School DistrictSeventh Circuit· 2002-07-03· cited 14×
- Moreland v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police DepartmentNinth Circuit· 1998-09-24· cited 10×
- Harris v. Clay County, MSFifth Circuit· 2022-08-24· cited 10×
- Vance v. RumsfeldN.D. Illinois· 2010-03-05· cited 9×
- Estate of Wells v. Bureau CountyC.D. Illinois· 2010-07-02· cited 6×
- David Sosa v. Martin County, FloridaEleventh Circuit· 2023-01-20· cited 6×
- Tinius v. Carroll County Sheriff DepartmentN.D. Iowa· 2003-04-07· cited 5×
- Russell v. LazarE.D. Wisconsin· 2004-01-27· cited 5×
- United States Ex Rel. Rickard v. SternesN.D. Illinois· 2001-06-07· cited 5×
Cites
58 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court· 1978-06-06· cited 41,449×
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court· 1994-06-06· cited 28,443×
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court· 1982-06-24· cited 22,846×
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court· 1976-02-24· cited 16,859×
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court· 1989-05-15· cited 16,485×
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court· 1985-06-28· cited 11,385×
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court· 1938-05-31· cited 10,545×
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court· 1989-02-28· cited 10,043×
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court· 1963-03-18· cited 8,419×
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court· 1984-07-03· cited 8,014×
- Board of the County Commissioners of Bryan County v. BrownSupreme Court· 1997-04-28· cited 7,185×
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court· 1981-05-18· cited 6,693×
- County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court· 1998-05-26· cited 6,212×
- Baker v. McCollanSupreme Court· 1979-06-26· cited 5,659×
- Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court· 1975-02-18· cited 4,350×
- Frye v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1923-12-03· cited 4,204×
- City of Oklahoma v. TuttleSupreme Court· 1985-08-14· cited 3,810×
- Collins v. City of Harker HeightsSupreme Court· 1992-02-26· cited 3,302×
- Zinermon v. BurchSupreme Court· 1990-02-27· cited 3,290×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.