State v. Williams
Citations
- 85 Md. 231
- 36 A. 823
- 1897 Md. LEXIS 38
Syllabus
<p>Appeals in CHmbial Cases — Question Decided Below Must Appear from the Record — Agreement of Counsel.</p> <p>Where indictment for a violation of the liquor law was quashed upon motion, and an appeal taken by the State under the Act of 1892, chap. 506, and there is nothing in the record to show the ground upon which the motion to quash was granted, the judgment will be affirmed. ,</p> <p>While counsel may be permitted to supply by agreement matters of fact accidently omitted from the record, they cannot be allowed to agree, not only as to the questions of law decided below, but also as to the grounds of the decision of the Judge below. The question brought to this Court for review should be clearly presented by the record.</p>
Judges: Fowler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Lohss and Sprenkle v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1974-06-27· cited 59×
- McBurney v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1977-03-23· cited 37×
- In Re Special Investigation No. 244Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1983-05-05· cited 24×
- In Re a Special Investigation No. 224Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1983-04-07· cited 7×
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Keller v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1858-07-20· cited 51×
- Johns v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1881-01-27· cited 33×
- Archer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1876-12-21· cited 15×
- Salfner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1896-11-19· cited 12×
- Queen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1821-06-15· cited 11×
- Parrish v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1859-07-15· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.