Court of Appeals of Maryland· 12/29/1983
Arbesman v. Winer
Citations
- 468 A.2d 633
- 298 Md. 282
- 1983 Md. LEXIS 342
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that when a husband and wife own property as tenants by the entireties, each spouse has an equal right to profits derived from the property
- discussing at length the nature of the estate and reviewing cases illustrative of its continuing validity in Maryland
- referring to “a ‘team theory’ approach to the tenancy by the entireties estate”
- “We have said that the nature of the tenants by the entirety estate is that . . . they must act together to sell their property, to lease it, or to subject it to any encumbrance.”
- where only the husband gave notice of termination of lease to tenant at will, his subsequent action for repossession of the premises held by him as a tenant by the entirety with his wife cannot be maintained
- they “hold by the entirety and not by the moieties”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Dean v. PinderCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1988-03-29· cited 47×
- State v. One 1984 Toyota TruckCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1987-11-23· cited 24×
- Jose Alvarez v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A.Fourth Circuit· 2013-10-23· cited 20×
- United States v. Charles Edward Gresham, Jr.Fourth Circuit· 1992-05-18· cited 19×
- Barclays American/Mortgage Corp. v. Wilkinson (In Re Wilkinson)D. Maryland· 1995-07-12· cited 18×
- Cruickshank-Wallace v. County Banking and Trust Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2005-10-31· cited 15×
- State v. One 1984 Toyota TruckCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1987-03-24· cited 10×
- Parker v. U.S. Trust Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2011-10-27· cited 10×
- Burns v. Scottish Development Co. Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2001-12-28· cited 8×
- Giles v. Chevy Chase Bank FSB (In Re Giles)D. Maryland· 1998-07-01· cited 4×
- Newsom v. Brock & Scott, PLLCCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2021-11-24· cited 4×
- In Re StreetD. Maryland· 1994-03-11· cited 3×
- Anderson v. JosephCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2011-07-11· cited 2×
- O'Brien v. Bank of America, N.A.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2013-09-09· cited 2×
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Phillips v. KrakowerFourth Circuit· 1931-01-13· cited 80×
- Crowe v. HouseworthCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1974-09-30· cited 76×
- Marburg v. ColeCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1878-06-28· cited 62×
- Beall v. BeallCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1981-09-11· cited 59×
- Columbian Carbon Co. v. KightCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1955-05-13· cited 40×
- Prairie Oil & Gas Co. v. AllenEighth Circuit· 1924-09-13· cited 37×
- Eastern Shore Building & Loan Corp. v. Bank of SomersetCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1969-05-15· cited 37×
- Lissau v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1958-02-19· cited 34×
- McCubbin v. StanfordCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1897-03-31· cited 33×
- State v. FriedmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1978-11-09· cited 30×
- Lake v. CallisCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1953-07-09· cited 25×
- A. Hupfel's Sons v. GettyThird Circuit· 1924-06-23· cited 22×
- Gent v. LynchCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1865-05-05· cited 21×
- Bukowitz v. Maryland Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1956-07-11· cited 19×
- William Penn Supply Corp. v. WattersonCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1958-11-24· cited 16×
- Wardrop v. WardropCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1956-07-31· cited 15×
- Gribble v. Stearman & Kaplan, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1968-03-19· cited 13×
- Routzahn v. CromerCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1959-05-11· cited 11×
- Brown v. RavenscraftCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1898-06-29· cited 8×
- Supreme Builders, Inc. v. RedmilesCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1968-07-02· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.