William Penn Supply Corp. v. Watterson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• A materialman could not enforce a mechanics’ lien because the notice to the husband was not received by the wife, and the Court has “consistently held that the relationship of principal and agent between a husband and wife may not be implied from the marital status of the parties”
• A materialman could not enforce a mechanics' lien because the notice to the husband was not received by the wife, and the Court has \consistently held that the relationship of principal and agent between a husband and wife may not be implied from the marital status of the parties\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).