Court of Appeals of Maryland· 11/9/1978
State v. Friedman
Citations
- 393 A.2d 1356
- 283 Md. 701
- 1978 Md. LEXIS 459
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that “a judgment obtained against both husband and wife arising out of a joint obligation may be satisfied by execution upon property held by the entireties”
- \there is no requirement in this context that the judgments be perfected against the husband and wife at the same instant\
- “[TJhere is no requirement in this contest that the judgments be perfected against a husband and wife at the same instant ...”
- \there is no requirement in this context that the judgments be perfected against the husband and wife at the same instant\
- Tenants by the entireties, “who can only be husband and wife, are in legal concept but one person, each being seized of the entirety, with the survivor taking the whole.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Murphy, Smith, Digges, Levine, Eldridge, Orth, Cóle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Sumy v. SchlossbergFourth Circuit· 1985-11-21· cited 95×
- Rutherford v. KatzenbergerCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1983-08-05· cited 92×
- Beall v. BeallCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1981-09-11· cited 59×
- Dean v. PinderCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1988-03-29· cited 47×
- Cattail Associates, Inc. v. SassCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2006-09-15· cited 26×
- Arbesman v. WinerCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1983-12-29· cited 21×
- ISN Bank v. RajaratnamSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-11-25· cited 21×
- Butler v. TilghmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1998-06-16· cited 18×
- In Re SumyFourth Circuit· 1985-11-21· cited 17×
- Cruickshank-Wallace v. County Banking and Trust Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2005-10-31· cited 15×
- Conrad v. SchlossbergD. Maryland· 2016-08-10· cited 11×
- In Re WetzlerD. Maryland· 1996-01-11· cited 10×
- State v. One 1984 Toyota TruckCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1987-03-24· cited 10×
- Levenson v. G.E. Capital Mortgage Services, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1994-11-16· cited 10×
- Wetzler v. CantorD. Maryland· 1996-11-15· cited 9×
- In Re RL Kelly and Sons, MillersD. Maryland· 1991-03-14· cited 4×
- In Re StreetD. Maryland· 1994-03-11· cited 3×
- Bruce v. DyerCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1986-07-29· cited 2×
- Ford v. FeltsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 1981-12-02· cited 2×
- O'Brien v. Bank of America, N.A.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2013-09-09· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.