A. Hupfel's Sons v. Getty

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding the consideration that the husband and wife gave and received in entering into their respective obligations was different

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Arbesman v. Winer
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1983-12-29· cited 21×
• ISN Bank v. Rajaratnam
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-11-25· cited 21×
• McCormick v. Mid-State Bank & Trust Co. (In Re McCormick)
  W.D. Pennsylvania· 1982-03-24· cited 18×
• In Re Arlene P. O'lexa, Debtor. Charles O. Zebley, Jr., Trustee
  Third Circuit· 2007-02-07· cited 15×
• Best v. Galloway (In Re Best)
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2009-07-30· cited 13×
• Consumers Time Credit, Inc. v. Remark Corp.
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1965-12-29· cited 12×
• In re Holler
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2011-12-13· cited 6×
• United States v. Provident Trust Co. of Pennsylvania
  Third Circuit· 1929-10-03· cited 3×
• Blusiewicz v. Rosenfield
  Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas· 1964-05-19· cited 3×
• Heald v. United States
  Tenth Circuit· 1949-11-01· cited 2×
• Wood v. Commissioner
  Board of Tax Appeals· 1932-09-26· cited 1×
• In Re: Arlene O'Lexa
  Third Circuit· 2007-02-07
• Commonwealth v. McLaughlin
  Philadelphia County Municipal Court· 1945-11-11
• Commonwealth v. Silvestro
  Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas· 1954-03-10
• ISN Bank v. Rajaratnam
  Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas· 2013-05-22

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Beihl v. Martin
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1912-05-22· cited 129×
• Fleek v. Zillhaver
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1887-10-17· cited 29×