Aragon-Lemus v. Barnhart

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that where ALJ rejected treating physician’s opinion based on another opinion that the claimant “was ‘probably only suited for a sedentary light job’ . . . , one would desire a less equivocal statement on which to base the decision” (emphasis in original)
• “[I]t is unclear exactly what the term ‘sedentary light job’ actually means; it is certainly not among the categories contained in the regulations.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).