Ronald E. Veino, Sr. v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social Security

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an ALJ’s decision is not supported by substantial evidence when the ALJ failed to compare medical records
• holding that it is within ALJ’s discretion to sort through and resolve conflicts in evidence
• holding that an ALJ’s decision in a continuing disability review case is not supported by substantial evidence when the ALJ failed to compare medical records
• holding that it is within the ALJ’s discretion to resolve genuine conflicts in the evidence
• holding that it is within ALJ’s discretion to sort through and resolve conflicts in evidence
• holding that an ALJ has discretion to accept or reject various portions of a treating physician’s opinion, based upon substantial evidence in the record

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).