Skip to main content
· 1/23/1998

Rita Schaal v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security, 1 Dockets 96-6212, 96-6316

Citations

  • 134 F.3d 496
  • 149 A.L.R. Fed. 679
  • 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 935

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • indicating that Mr. Connolly’s mother scheduled his medical appointments
  • stating it was proper for ALJ to consider Plaintiffs poor work history
  • “The lack of clinical findings complained of by the ALJ did not justify the failure to assign at least some weight” to the treating physician’s opinion
  • “It is for the SSA, and not this court, to weigh the conflicting evidence in the record”
  • “It is for the SSA, and not this court, to weigh the conflicting evidence in the record”
  • “[E]ven if the clinical findings were inadequate, it was the ALJ’s duty to seek additional information from [the treating physician] sua sponte.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Altimari, Walker, Cabranes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.