Skip to main content
Second Circuit· 4/30/1987

Johnson v. Bowen

Citations

  • 817 F.2d 983

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that remand solely for calculation of benefits is appropriate where record “compel[s] but one conclusion under the substantial evidence standard”
  • noting further reconsideration of error is not required where “application of the correct legal principles to the record could lead to only one conclusion[.]’
  • reversing where court could not “ascertain whether [the ALJ] applied the correct legal principles … in assessing [plaintiff’s] eligibility for disability benefits”
  • reversing where the court could not “ascertain whether [the ALJ] applied the correct legal principles … in assessing [plaintiff’s] eligibility for disability benefits”
  • reversing where the court could not “ascertain whether [the ALJ] applied the correct legal principles … in assessing [plaintiff’s] eligibility for disability benefits”
  • reversing where the court could not determine whether the ALJ applied the correct legal principles in assessing plaintiff’s eligibility for disability benefits

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

146 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.