C.G.B. v. Wolf

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that petitioner’s status as a trespasser precluded a finding that the use lawfully existed, and therefore the use could not be a nonconforming use
• holding that petitioner's status as a trespasser precluded a finding that the use lawfully existed, and therefore the use could not be a nonconforming use
• collecting cases 26 No.30826-0-III Gamboa v. Clark holding that permission need not be express, but can be implied
• collecting cases holding that permission need not be express, but can be implied

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).