· 8/27/2012
Apsley v. The Boeing Company
Citations
- 691 F.3d 1184
- 26 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1439
- 54 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1024
- 2012 WL 3642800
- 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 18161
- 115 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1573
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming district court’s decision granting summary judgment in favor of defendant on plaintiffs’ collective action claim for pattern and practice of age discrimination and denying decertification motion as moot
- “[A]dministrative remedies generally must be exhausted as to each discrete instance of discrimination or retaliation.”
- charge must put defendant on notice of claims; although plaintiff checked box for retaliation, narrative did not give notice that plaintiff claimed retaliation relating to gender, race or disability
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Briscoe, Baldock, Holmes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.