· 10/20/2005
Shikles v. Sprint/United Management Co.
Citations
- 426 F.3d 1304
- 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 22530
- 87 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 42,129
- 96 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1156
- 2005 WL 2671597
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that where plaintiff “failed to exhaust his administrative remedies .... the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over his claim”
- holding that a private sector employee was required to cooperate with the EEOC in order to exhaust his administrative remedies
- holding that a private sector em ployee was required to cooperate with the EEOC in order to exhaust his adm inistrative rem edies
- recognizing that ADEA and Title VII require exhaustion of administrative remedies
- recognizing that ADEA and Title VII require exhaustion of administrative remedies
- holding exhaustion of administrative remedies “is a jurisdictional prerequisite to suit under Title VII” and ADEA
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ebel, McWilliams, Friot
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.