Kinetic Instruments, Inc. v. Lares

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding jurisdiction under the “fraud” prong of the piercing doctrine on the basis of the plaintiffs allegations, despite the defendant’s affidavit denying the alleged fraud
• having a regular and established place of business involves more than “doing business” in forum district
• “It is appropriate to pierce the corporate veil in order to establish venue under the patent venue statutes.”
• “It is appropriate to pierce the corporate veil in order to establish venue under the patent venue statutes.”
• “It is appropriate to pierce the corporate veil in order to establish venue under the patent venue statutes.”
• “To hold a corporate officer personally liable for direct infringement under § 271(a), there must be evidence to justify piercing the corporate veil.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

37 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Bensusan Restaurant Corporation v. Richard B. King, Individually and Doing Business as the Blue Note
  Second Circuit· 1997-09-10· cited 290×
• Patin v. Thoroughbred Power Boats Inc.
  Fifth Circuit· 2002-06-12· cited 203×
• Bensusan Restaurant Corp. v. King
  S.D. New York· 1996-09-09· cited 133×
• Pilates, Inc. v. Pilates Institute, Inc.
  S.D. New York· 1995-07-10· cited 83×
• Merck & Co. v. Mediplan Health Consulting, Inc.
  S.D. New York· 2006-03-30· cited 82×
• Ontel Products, Inc. v. Project Strategies Corp.
  S.D. New York· 1995-09-14· cited 78×
• Beatie and Osborn LLP v. Patriot Scientific Corp.
  S.D. New York· 2006-05-09· cited 75×
• Brady v. Basic Research, L.L.C.
  E.D. New York· 2015-03-31· cited 53×
• Bellepointe, Inc. v. Kohl's Department Stores, Inc.
  S.D. New York· 1997-09-04· cited 46×
• In Re Sumitomo Copper Litigation
  S.D. New York· 2000-10-30· cited 34×
• In Re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001
  S.D. New York· 2010-06-17· cited 32×
• Laborers Local 17 Health & Benefit Fund v. Philip Morris, Inc.
  S.D. New York· 1998-08-27· cited 29×
• Packer v. TDI Systems, Inc.
  S.D. New York· 1997-03-31· cited 27×
• Weinreich v. Sandhaus
  S.D. New York· 1994-04-28· cited 19×
• Weisfelner v. Blavatnik (In re Lyondell Chemical Co.)
  S.D. New York· 2016-01-04· cited 17×
• Wolo Mfg. Corp. v. ABC Corp.
  E.D. New York· 2018-11-07· cited 14×
• Baron Philippe De Rothschild v. Paramount Distillers, Inc.
  S.D. New York· 1996-05-01· cited 11×
• Falik v. Smith
  S.D. New York· 1995-04-27· cited 10×
• Art Leather Manufacturing Co. v. Albumx Corp.
  S.D. New York· 1995-06-06· cited 10×
• Securities & Exchange Commission v. AIMSI Technologies, Inc.
  S.D. New York· 2009-07-24· cited 10×

Cites

45 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• International Shoe Co. v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 1945-12-03· cited 18,588×
• Burger King Corp. v. Rudzewicz
  Supreme Court· 1985-05-20· cited 12,253×
• World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson
  Supreme Court· 1980-01-21· cited 8,668×
• Hanson v. Denckla
  Supreme Court· 1958-10-13· cited 7,025×
• Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.
  Supreme Court· 1987-02-24· cited 3,642×
• Calder v. Jones
  Supreme Court· 1984-03-20· cited 3,198×
• Milliken v. Meyer
  Supreme Court· 1941-01-20· cited 3,141×
• Keeton v. Hustler Magazine, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1984-03-20· cited 2,597×
• Omni Capital International, Ltd. v. Rudolf Wolff & Co.
  Supreme Court· 1987-12-08· cited 1,419×
• Marine Midland Bank, N.A. v. James W. Miller
  Second Circuit· 1981-11-20· cited 733×
• Bruce Ball v. Metallurgie Hoboken-Overpelt, S.A.
  Second Circuit· 1990-04-27· cited 663×
• Fourco Glass Co. v. Transmirra Products Corp.
  Supreme Court· 1957-04-29· cited 584×
• Kreutter v. McFadden Oil Corp.
  New York Court of Appeals· 1988-03-29· cited 515×
• Hoffritz for Cutlery, Inc. And Edwin Jay, Inc. v. Amajac, Ltd. And Jack E. Ayers
  Second Circuit· 1985-05-15· cited 404×
• Manville Sales Corporation, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Paramount Systems, Inc., Robert S. Butterworth and Anthony J. Disimone
  Federal Circuit· 1990-10-23· cited 364×
• Laufer v. Ostrow
  New York Court of Appeals· 1982-03-30· cited 354×
• Ve Holding Corporation v. Johnson Gas Appliance Company
  Federal Circuit· 1990-10-24· cited 227×
• Zubik v. Zubik
  Third Circuit· 1967-09-29· cited 193×
• Max Daetwyler Corp., a New York Corporation v. R. Meyer, a West German Corporation. Appeal of Rolf Meyer
  Third Circuit· 1985-06-18· cited 179×
• Lakota Girl Scout Council, Inc. v. Havey Fund-Raising Management, Inc., and Francis P. Havey
  Eighth Circuit· 1975-06-27· cited 174×