Skip to main content
· 11/9/2006

Darrell Rittenberry v. Jack Morgan

Citations

  • 468 F.3d 331
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 27680
  • 2006 WL 3230278

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that petitions filed by prisoners in custody pursuant to a state court judgment are to be filed under § 2254
  • holding that “all petitions seeking relief from state court convictions are . . . specifically filed under [§] 2254”
  • holding that “all petitions seeking relief from state court convictions” fall under § 2254
  • holding that “all petitions seeking relief from state court convictions” fall under § 2254
  • holding that “all petitions seeking relief from state court convictions” fall under § 2254
  • holding that “all petitions seeking relief from state court convictions” fall under § 2254

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Martin, Gilman, Sargus

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.