Anthony Hill v. Ricardo Rios

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[A] litigant who bypasses arguments on appeal cannot depict his own omission as an ‘extraordinary’ event that justifies postjudgment relief.”
• “Rule 60(b) cannot be used to reopen the judgment in a civil case just because later authority shows that the judgment may have been incorrect.”
• “Rule 60(b) cannot be used to reopen the judgment in a civil case just because later authority shows that the judgment may have been incorrect.”
• “[L]egal developments after a judgment becomes final do not qualify as extraordi- nary.”
• “[Ljegal developments after a judgment becomes final do not qualify as extraordinary.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).