Hearst Corp. v. Hoppe

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the state disclosure act “closely parallels FOIA . . . and thus judicial interpretations of that act are particularly helpful in construing our own” (internal citation omitted)
• noting that the PRA is more severe than FOIA in several areas, such as the awarding of attorney fees
• noting that the PRA is more severe than FOIA in several areas, such as the awarding of attorney fees
• “Leaving interpretation of the act to those at whom it was aimed would be the most direct course to its devitalization.”
• identifying examples of private information, including sexual relations, family quarrels, unpleasant or disgraceful or humiliating illnesses, or intimate, personal letters
• “leaving interpretation of the act to those at whom it was aimed would be the most direct course to its devitalization”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).