Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “all of the Pickett Error Stamps” would be destroyed and replaced
• holding fraudulent misrepresentation \must touch upon the reasons for the investment's decline in value\
• holding fraudulent misrepresentation \must touch upon the reasons for the investment's decline in value\
• rejecting a claim for promissory estoppel under Delaware law because “reliance upon a mere expression of future intention cannot be reasonable, because such expressions do not constitute a sufficiently definite promise” (internal quotation marks and citations omitted)
• “[Recklessness on the part of a defendant meets the scienter requirement of Section 10(b) and Rule 10b — 5”
• “[Rjecklessness on the part of a defendant meets the scienter requirement of Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).