Andri v. Mukasey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]here was no conflict between the ALJ’s step five 3 determination that [the claimant] could complete only simple tasks and the vocational 4 expert’s testimony that [the claimant] could do jobs that [the DOT] categorizes at 5 ‘Reasoning Level 2.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).