Skip to main content
· 9/14/2007

Tendean v. Gonzales

Citations

  • 503 F.3d 8
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 22050
  • 2007 WL 2685155

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a district court is permitted to consider 11 trial evidence in determining forfeiture
  • finding that “substantial evidence support[ed] the BIA’s findings that Tendean [could] avoid future persecution by relocating” because there was “no sign that Tendean or his family faced any risk outside” his “very small home village” in Indonesia
  • applying substantial evidence standard to an IJ’s findings concerning the reasonableness of relocation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Torruella, Selya, Tashima

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.