First Circuit· 7/31/2009
Banturino v. Holder
Citations
- 576 F.3d 10
- 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 17007
- 2009 WL 2343171
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Where the agency’s interpretation of the evidence as a whole is reasonable, we do not disturb it.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lynch, Torruella, Howard
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Wakkary v. HolderNinth Circuit· 2009-03-10· cited 1,426×
- Mufied v. MukaseySecond Circuit· 2007-11-20· cited 189×
- Ranjit John Singh Chand Kumari, A/K/A Chand Kumari Singh Renika Singh v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceNinth Circuit· 1996-09-06· cited 154×
- Wan Chien Kho v. KeislerFirst Circuit· 2007-10-16· cited 75×
- Pulisir v. MukaseyFirst Circuit· 2008-04-29· cited 69×
- Sompotan v. MukaseyFirst Circuit· 2008-07-16· cited 42×
- Sunoto v. GonzalesFirst Circuit· 2007-09-27· cited 29×
- Budiono v. MukaseyFirst Circuit· 2008-11-19· cited 27×
- Oroh v. HolderFirst Circuit· 2009-03-27· cited 20×
- Sombah v. MukaseyFirst Circuit· 2008-06-17· cited 19×
- Sinurat v. MukaseyFirst Circuit· 2008-08-08· cited 10×
- Pangemanan v. HolderFirst Circuit· 2009-06-10· cited 10×
- Siahaan v. MukaseyFirst Circuit· 2008-10-17· cited 4×
- Andri v. MukaseyFirst Circuit· 2008-12-16· cited 4×
- Odmar v. MukaseyFirst Circuit· 2008-10-01· cited 3×
- Massie v. GonzalesFirst Circuit· 2007-05-25· cited 1×
Other cases named Banturino v. Holder
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.