· 12/6/2011
Nickey Brown v. Oil States Skagit Smatco
Citations
- 664 F.3d 71
- 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 24231
- 113 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1537
- 2011 WL 6032969
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “magistrate judge denied the motion for recusal” under Section 455
- stating that even though “the district court did not explicitly address this lesser sanction in its opinion, we find that the court implicitly rejected this sanction as inappropriate because it would not effectively punish [the party’s] serious misconduct”
- finding “that the court implicitly rejected [lesser] sanction[s] as inappropriate because [they] would not effectively punish” the party’s conduct
- affirming dismissal with prejudice where court considered monetary sanction but found plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status meant he would be unable to pay it
- affirming district court’s determination that dismissal was the only appropriate sanction where a plaintiff lied at deposition
- magistrate judge denied motion for his recusal, and the district court denied this motion for review.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jolly, King, Per Curiam, Wiener
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.