United States v. Rugerio Valdiosera-Godinez and Alejandro Garcia-Gil

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that in Chestemut, the Supreme Court listed a command to halt as one factor that could support a finding of seizure
• holding that claim only mentioned in statement of issues was abandoned
• considering such an inference permissible in the context of sufficiency-of-the-evidence review
• intent to distribute found based on 66 ½ pounds of 91% pure cocaine

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).