Skip to main content

Russell v. State

Citations

  • 879 So. 2d 1261
  • 2004 WL 1780917

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the per se reversible error occurred in the trial court’s failure to accept a facially race-neutral reason for a strike and failing to then inquire as to the genuineness of the reason
  • stating that a potential juror having a relative in law enforcement “has been repeatedly found to be a valid, race neutral or gender neutral reason for a peremptory strike”
  • stating that a potential juror having a relative in law enforcement “has been repeatedly found to be a valid, race neutral or gender neutral reason for a peremptory strike”
  • reversing because the trial court incorrectly rejected the defense's facially-neutral reason and failed to assess the \genuineness of the proffered reason\
  • reversing because the trial court incorrectly rejected the defense's facially-neutral reason and failed to assess the “genuineness of the proffered reason”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Green, Ramirez, and Shepherd

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.