Anderson v. Pilgrim's Pride Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that donning of a hairnet, ear plugs, rubber boots, gloves, apron, and smock was for the employee’s benefit and was not “work”
• donning of aprons, smocks, gloves, boots, hairnet, and earplugs not compensable
• donning of aprons, smocks, gloves, boots, hairnet, and earplugs not compensable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).