Skip to main content
· 9/4/2008

Pirant v. United States Postal Service

Citations

  • 542 F.3d 202
  • 13 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1857
  • 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 18912
  • 91 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,308
  • 2008 WL 4072817

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • in rejecting argument that factual change in amended answer entitled the plaintiff to a trial, the Court stated \[a]n amended pleading supersedes the original and an inconsistency between the initial and amended pleading does not preclude summary judgment\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Cudahy, Sykes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.