Chao v. Tyson Foods, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that genuine issue of material fact existed as to whether donning and doffing activities were integral and indispensable to primary activities of chicken processing employees
• denying motions for summary judgment on integral and indispensable issue where disputed facts existed over who primarily benefitted from use of protective clothing and gear
• denying summary judgment because “a question of material fact remains as to whether the benefit it receives is so significant that it is Defendant, and not Defendant’s employees, who receives the primary benefit thereof.”
• “the proper focus is on the aggregate amount of uncompensated time . . . per day, not the total number . . . over any length of time.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).