In Re Cargill Meat Solutions Wage & Hour Litigation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “time Plaintiffs spent donning [and] gathering … work-related gear and equipment … is compensable under the FLSA”
• “[F]or purposes of statutory interpretation, an exception contained in § 203 should not be treated differently from an exemption contained in § 213.”
• “Demand letters stating a claim may be sufficient to trigger an obligation to preserve.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).