Anderson v. DeLisle

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that fraud may form the basis of an unjust-enrichment claim
• reversing judgment notwithstanding the verdict because \the jury reasonably could find that equity and good conscience require [defendant] to compensate [plaintiff]\
• court of appeals upheld a jury’s finding of unjust enrichment, in effect concluding that the vendors’ conduct amounted to illegal or criminal actions. The vendors (1) stood silent and watched plaintiff make extensive improvements to their property, (2
• seller knew there was little chance contract would succeed
• unjust enrichment action based on considerations of moral wrongness

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).