Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 8/7/1984
Anderson v. DeLisle
Citations
- 352 N.W.2d 794
- 1984 Minn. App. LEXIS 3404
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that fraud may form the basis of an unjust-enrichment claim
- reversing judgment notwithstanding the verdict because \the jury reasonably could find that equity and good conscience require [defendant] to compensate [plaintiff]\
- court of appeals upheld a jury’s finding of unjust enrichment, in effect concluding that the vendors’ conduct amounted to illegal or criminal actions. The vendors (1) stood silent and watched plaintiff make extensive improvements to their property, (2
- seller knew there was little chance contract would succeed
- unjust enrichment action based on considerations of moral wrongness
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Foley, Sedgwick, Randall
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Harvell v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 2007-07-03· cited 82×
- Ventura v. Titan Sports, Inc.Eighth Circuit· 1995-09-11· cited 70×
- Southtown Plumbing, Inc. v. Har-Ned Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1992-12-08· cited 62×
- Schumacher v. SchumacherCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2001-06-05· cited 56×
- DEPT. OF SECURITIES EX REL. FAUGHT v. BlairSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 2010-04-06· cited 33×
- Mon-Ray, Inc. v. Granite Re, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2004-04-07· cited 26×
- Midwest Sports Marketing, Inc. v. Hillerich & Bradsby of Canada, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1996-07-16· cited 25×
- Holman v. CPT CORP.Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1990-07-03· cited 24×
- Galante v. Oz, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1986-01-21· cited 16×
- Hommerding v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1985-11-05· cited 14×
- Sullivan v. DB Investments, Inc.Third Circuit· 2010-07-13· cited 14×
- Park-Lake Car Wash, Inc. v. SpringerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1986-09-30· cited 10×
- Cummings v. Paramount Partners, LPD. Minnesota· 2010-05-25· cited 10×
- Oklahoma Department of Securities ex rel. Faught v. BlairSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 2010-02-23· cited 10×
- Bank of Montreal v. Avalon Capital Group, Inc.D. Minnesota· 2010-09-30· cited 9×
- Tourville v. KowarschCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1985-04-02· cited 7×
- Custom Design Studio, a Division of L.B. Baron Properties, Inc. v. Chloe, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1998-09-29· cited 6×
- In Re R. Bastyr and Associates, Inc.D. Minnesota· 1988-01-14· cited 6×
- Goodbye Vanilla, LLC v. Aimia Proprietary Loyalty U.S. Inc.D. Maine· 2018-01-18· cited 6×
- Brakke v. HilgersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1985-10-01· cited 5×
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Klass v. Twin City Federal Savings and Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1971-08-13· cited 27×
- Georgopolis v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1952-06-20· cited 26×
- Lawrence Zirinsky v. James L. Sheehan, John D. Sheehan and Brooklyn Center Industrial Park, Inc.Eighth Circuit· 1969-08-11· cited 24×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.