Skip to main content
· 7/3/1990

Holman v. CPT CORP.

Citations

  • 457 N.W.2d 740
  • 1990 Minn. App. LEXIS 662
  • 1990 WL 89656

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reversing summary judgment because plaintiff presented question of fact as to whether plaintiff deserved compensation for sale finalized by former employer after termination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Foley, Kalitowski, Schumacher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.