D. Minnesota· 5/25/2010
Cummings v. Paramount Partners, LP
Citations
- 715 F. Supp. 2d 880
- 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 51902
- 2010 WL 2104630
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \Plaintiffs also have alleged that they suffered an injury and they have presented sufficient factual content from which it is reasonable to infer that the moving Defendant's asserted breach of the duty owed to Plaintiff was the proximate cause of such injury.\
- “Plaintiffs also have alleged that they suffered an injury and they have presented sufficient factual content from which it is reasonable to infer that the moving Defendant’s asserted breach of the duty owed to Plaintiff was the proximate cause of such injury.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Richard H. Kyle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In re St. Jude Medical, Inc. Securities LitigationD. Minnesota· 2011-12-23· cited 12×
- Bank of Montreal v. Avalon Capital Group, Inc.D. Minnesota· 2010-09-30· cited 9×
- In re Biozoom, Inc. Securities LitigationN.D. Ohio· 2015-02-26· cited 4×
- Oklahoma Firefighters Pension & Retirement System v. Capella Education Co.D. Minnesota· 2012-06-01· cited 4×
- United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. CollyardD. Minnesota· 2015-12-09· cited 3×
- W. Va. Pipe Trades Health & Welfare Fund v. Medtronic, Inc.D. Maine· 2018-03-02· cited 1×
- Christianson v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLCD. Maine· 2018-09-07
Cites
52 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court· 2009-05-18· cited 149,772×
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 146,720×
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court· 2007-06-21· cited 6,044×
- Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. BroudoSupreme Court· 2005-04-19· cited 2,236×
- Central Bank of Denver, N. A. v. First Interstate Bank of Denver, N. A.Supreme Court· 1994-04-19· cited 1,685×
- Stoneridge Investment Partners, LLC v. Scientific-Atlanta, Inc.Supreme Court· 2008-01-15· cited 943×
- Pinter v. DahlSupreme Court· 1988-06-15· cited 784×
- Porous Media Corporation v. Pall CorporationEighth Circuit· 1999-09-08· cited 755×
- Martin v. AubuchonEighth Circuit· 1980-07-23· cited 586×
- Vicki Westcott, Administratrix of the Estate of Arden Westcott, Deceased v. City of Omaha, a Municipal CorporationEighth Circuit· 1990-05-08· cited 535×
- Schaaf v. Residential Funding Corp.Eighth Circuit· 2008-02-22· cited 347×
- Unnamed caseEighth Circuit· 2002-10-02· cited 227×
- Lentell v. Merrill Lynch & Co. Inc.Second Circuit· 2005-01-20· cited 226×
- Volk v. D.A. Davidson & Co.Ninth Circuit· 1987-05-13· cited 213×
- Cornelia I. Crowell GST Trust v. Possis Medical, Inc.Eighth Circuit· 2008-03-21· cited 178×
- Hoang Minh Ly v. NystromSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2000-08-03· cited 167×
- Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd. v. Tellabs, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 2006-01-25· cited 155×
- In Re Refco, Inc. Securities LitigationS.D. New York· 2007-04-30· cited 154×
- Wartnick v. Moss & BarnettSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1992-10-02· cited 124×
- Morton v. BeckerEighth Circuit· 1986-07-07· cited 107×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.