Tourville v. Kowarsch

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting “the trial court accepted respondent’s testimony that the parties did not have an agreement that appellant had an interest in the property”
• without written agreement, cohabitor could not recover labor and material costs, for home improvements when house in other party’s name and trial court accepted other party’s testimony that he and cohabitor had no agreement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).